Rev. Sean on GA12 grid, process

Rev. Sean blogs:

Since I was at the meeting where the schedule was created, I want to ask you to think about a few things as you begin to respond:

First, be gentle in your critique. This schedule is the result of a lot of good people working hard together to respond to a wide variety of needs and expectations.  We made a very clear decision to privilege the needs of the local community and let THEM tell us what they need. The form the schedule takes reflects that. It’s more about the local community’s needs than our hopes and expectations.

Second, I learned at the meeting that there are not (at this point) a whole lot of ways that 3000-4000 UUs can be truly helpful to the local community. There are many ways that trying to meet OUR need to do something that we recognize as service/witness would tax the local community’s resources. We can’t just descend on them. And the amount of organization and resources that a huge service project would demand would actually be a drain on the limited resources of the very people we hope to serve. Knowing this, we’ve tried hard to find ways that  we can use our presence, power, and resources to do things that are truly helpful.  This GA will offer many ways to be of service, but they may not look like we may have expected.

Third, (and I’m not sure I know how to say this gently) we have A LOT to learn. The amount of education and preparation is very intentional and is also a response to the local community wanting us to truly understand not just the issues they face, but the history behind those issues. Education is perhaps THE very most powerful thing we can do to help–not only the Arizona migrants–but people back home, who also face the consequences of this history in ways both similar and dissimilar.  If we can get thousands of UUs to grapple with the history/theology of the Doctrine of Discovery OR to understand the basics of coalition building and community organizing OR to feel like they can help make a difference with the privilege and power they have…well, we’d have accomplished a lot.

Fourth, there will be a lot of choices built into this GA. People will be able to choose how much service they can do, how much history they want to learn, how many practical “take it home” skills they learn, etc.  The “grid” can’t reflect that very well. But what I heard among the very key people at the planning meeting was a deep desire to allow attendees as much flexibility as possible to learn, reflect, and act.  All of that, of course, takes place within the constraints of time, space, and available resources.

Truly, I was amazed by the commitment, dedication, realism, and vision of the planners. This GA won’t be perfect. It probably won’t be like you imagine it. But it will be a very heartfelt effort to create something that helps create justice and truly partners with the people who need us in Arizona.

One of our partners in this work, B Loewe , Communications Director at National Day Laborer Organizing Network, started our time together with a reflection on three goals we might share for this experiment we call “Justice GA”:

1. Build power for the local communities by using our resources, privilege, and access (especially to the media) to draw attention to the struggle in Arizona and the deeper inequities and injustices it reveals.

2. Shrink disbelief among our own people and among people throughout this nation who think and say, “I just can’t believe our government would do these things” or “I didn’t know it was so bad.”

3. Enlarge compassion.

He reminded us that we are not expected to do a Justice GA perfectly, but we are committed to doing it in partnership with the people who invited us, with the people who have taken the risk to make it happen, and with each other.

Love Will Guide Us,

Sean

–to which I can only respond, so may we be!

1 comment to Rev. Sean on GA12 grid, process

  • The Emerson Avenger

    Well *I* could add a few things to that and then some. . .

    If Unitarian Universalists cannot actually *be* like this within the context of their own religious community, what makes them think that they can genuinely *be* this way in the larger “real world”?

    How can Unitarian Universalists credibly “draw attention to the struggle in Arizona and the deeper inequities and injustices it reveals” when they so willfully turn blind eyes and deaf ears to the inequities and injustices within their own “church”?

    Injustices like anti-Christian and broader anti-religious intolerance & bigotry.

    Injustices like anti-Republican and broader anti-conservative intolerance & bigotry.

    Injustices like UU clergy misconduct in ALL its forms, not just clergy sexual misconduct which is often rather poorly handled by the UUA in any case. . .
    Glaring inequities such as the fact that MFC Rules allow a UU minister who has been defellowshipped due to clergy misconduct to appeal that ruling but absolutely NO process of appeal open to allow clergy misconduct complainants to challenge unjust MFC rulings. . .

    When will Unitarian Universalists in general, and UU clergy in particular. . . work to shrink disbelief among your own people and among U*Us throughout The UU World who think and say, “I just can’t believe our religious community would do these things” or “I didn’t know it* was so bad. . .”???

    * It can be the UUA’s ongoing negligent and effectively complicit mishandling of clergy misconduct complaints and any number of other internal U*U injustices and abuses such as the anti-religious intolerance and bigotry that I already mentioned.

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv badge

so may we categorize: